Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Thunderbolts*: This mystery concerning Bucky Barnes completely ignored by the MCU film

Thunderbolts*: This mystery concerning Bucky Barnes completely ignored by the MCU film

Thunderbolts*, the latest film in the MCU, sees Marvel's gang of misfits join forces to save the world—or at least, New York—from a new threat, created from scratch by Valentina Allegra de Fontaine. Bucky Barnes, one of Steve Rogers' best friends, is back, more tired and alone than ever, taking center stage... And one detail about the character represents an inconsistency with Guardians of the Galaxy!

Thunderbolts*: This mystery concerning Bucky Barnes completely ignored by the MCU film

Thunderbolts*, a highly acclaimed MCU film

Thunderbolts*: This mystery concerning Bucky Barnes completely ignored by the MCU film

Despite excellent press reviews and very positive comments from viewers, the The 36th film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe isn't exactly a massive box office success. Thunderbolts* has grossed $370 million worldwide, against an estimated budget of $180 million. By exploring dark themes like depression, bipolar disorder, and loneliness, Jake Schreier has given us one of the best MCU projects in a long time. Many fans believe that the last Marvel film to be as successful was James Gunn's Guardians of the Galaxy 3. It's also one of the heroes of this cosmic team who is at the origin of an inconsistency in Thunderbolts*. A Bucky Barnes in full in Thunderbolts* Remember: in Guardians of the Galaxy, Happy Holidays, released in 2022 directly on Disney+, James Gunn's superhero team celebrates Christmas. The vigilantes exchange gifts, and Rocket Racoon receives an item he's been eyeing since Avengers Infinity War: Bucky Barnes' Vibranium arm! However, in Thunderbolts*, the Winter Soldier did indeed recover his metal limb (regularly cleaned in the dishwasher) without explaining how he got his hands on it. Knowing that James Gunn has stated that Guardians of the Galaxy Happy Holidays is canon within the MCU, this omission is definitely an inconsistency!

Post a Comment

0 Comments